On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:50:34 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Martin Gräßlin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it also > > works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what we > > use > > today it could be. > > 2014.06-90 for the beta release of Plasma Next with the last stable > > release > > having been in June 2014. > > How about simply adding "beta1"? Eg. "2014.06-beta1" or "2014.06.rc1" > > Plain and simple.
Is it? It makes everything more difficult as it's alpha-numeric instead of just numeric and with such a scheme I would assume that it is the beta for June 2014 release. Thus the release 2014.06 would have a smaller version number than the beta release. 2014.06 < 2014.06-rc3 2014.06-0 < 2014.06-rc3 2014.06-final < 2014.06-rc3 etc. And as already discussed using the date of the final release in pre-releases is dangerous. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
