El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va escriure: > On Monday 27 January 2014 14:37:03 Martin Klapetek wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I've processed the discussion in the previous thread, we discussed it a > > bit > > in today's Plasma Monday hangout and here is a reiteration of the naming > > proposal. Please please /always/ keep plasma-devel in CC, if not, I'll > > hunt you down at Akademy and give you a disapproving look. > > > > Alright, here it is: > > * The press/promo name of the workspace and close friends release will be > > > > "Plasma" with the "by KDE" touch, it should never appear as "KDE Plasma" > > again in our articles/blogs, nor just "KDE" when referring to the > > workspace > > * Versioning will be the date, eg. "Plasma 2014.06" (please refer to the > > previous thread for details on "why the date and not "5" and/or "2"). > > Updates to those releases will be in form of "2nd update to Plasma > > 2014.06". The minor version also needs to be appended to the date, mainly > > for packagers, so we advise "2014.06-2". Exact date scheme is yet to be > > determined, comments on that welcome > > I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might be > better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4.
Just after reading the email I also thought that 2014.06.2 looks "more consistent" than 2014.06-2, on the other hand 2014.06.2 may "easily" be confused with a date while 2014.06-2 not so much, so I'm not really sure what I like better :D Cheers, Albert P.S: Yes I know, this email probably wasn't very useful :D _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
