On Monday 27 January 2014 14:37:03 Martin Klapetek wrote: > Hey all, > > I've processed the discussion in the previous thread, we discussed it a bit > in today's Plasma Monday hangout and here is a reiteration of the naming > proposal. Please please /always/ keep plasma-devel in CC, if not, I'll > hunt you down at Akademy and give you a disapproving look. > > Alright, here it is: > > * The press/promo name of the workspace and close friends release will be > "Plasma" with the "by KDE" touch, it should never appear as "KDE Plasma" > again in our articles/blogs, nor just "KDE" when referring to the workspace > * Versioning will be the date, eg. "Plasma 2014.06" (please refer to the > previous thread for details on "why the date and not "5" and/or "2"). > Updates to those releases will be in form of "2nd update to Plasma > 2014.06". The minor version also needs to be appended to the date, mainly > for packagers, so we advise "2014.06-2". Exact date scheme is yet to be > determined, comments on that welcome
I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might be better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4. > * The marine theme will be dropped, we recognize there were too many > objections and the feeling was rather negative towards that Thank you for valuing consensus so much. I would like to ask everybody who discusses in this thread to show the same respect. > * Inside Plasma team, we'll start referring to the next version simply as > "Plasma Next". This will always be the "next major version to be released". > We encourage everyone to start using "Plasma Next", we don't want this to > be inside-thing only Hmmm, it makes sense as temporary solution until we have a release date (the role Plasma 2 is fulfilling atm) but I'm not sure if it doesn't just add unneeded clutter to our message. Once we know there will be a plasma 2014.06, we can just call it that, right? > So that's the new iteration summed up, next week I'll collect the comments > again and hopefully we'll have a consensus. Also please keep the discussion > constructive and positive, if possible :) > > Cheers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
