On Tuesday 21 January 2014 02:43:04 Markus Slopianka wrote: > Am Freitag, 17. Januar 2014, 18:37:27 schrieb Ivan Čukić: > > It seems we mostly agree on the Plasma Year Month, and Plasma by KDE* > > naming, at least in principle. Which is awesome. > > Considering that we already released official announcements de facto using > Plasma (Workspaces) 2 as branding for almost one year[1], I cannot see any > positive thing about changing version numbering once again.
We made it always quite clear that this is a working title - at least it was always quite clear to us. I don't see a reason why we should keep to a working title just because we used it in communication. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
