On Friday 20 April 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote: > On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote: > > I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really > > not the time to do it, any good intention and vision is not much use if > > there is not the technical foundation being layd down, and at the moment > > there isn't. i would see this useful a year from now, not now (maybe if > > the goal was 80% programming 20% talking things would be a bit > > different). > > maybe i'm wrong but i'm feeling it's a waste right now. > > > > anyways good luck with it, i hope i'll be proved wrong. > I'm no expert, but the vision should NOT be driven by technology but instead > the other way around, once we have the vision and we have the solution to > implement that vision, then we will have to care about what technology we > have to create/adapt/adopt/etc. Of course since we are developers we will > be doing technical work before vision/solution is finished. +1000 - I think that is really important to first get what we want to achieve and afterwards work on the technology side to get it implemented. And that's a good reason to have the sprint *now* before we have libplasma2 and before we have ported to Wayland.
Btw I am quite confident that the ideas which will come up will have no impact at all on the current Plasma codebase. What's possible right now can be implemented with QML 1 and everything else just has to wait. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
