On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote: > I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really not > the time to do it, any good intention and vision is not much use if there > is not the technical foundation being layd down, and at the moment there > isn't. i would see this useful a year from now, not now (maybe if the goal > was 80% programming 20% talking things would be a bit different). > maybe i'm wrong but i'm feeling it's a waste right now. > > anyways good luck with it, i hope i'll be proved wrong.
Well, We need to accommodate a lot of new people into the workspace team (starting by myself) and I think that this sprint is a good starting point to create together a vision and a set of goals we can share and work on them in the following months. If now that we have a good momentum we ask people to get involved on libplasma2 (I guess that's what you mean with technical fundation) two things can happend: 1-Everybody joings libplasma2 development, coordination is a mess, lot of new people working in old code etc, not ideal. 2-We wait until libplasma2 is done, maybe when it is done we don't have this much interested people anymore. Anyway, in the irc meeting we had, we all agreed on working (all of us) on porting first everything to QML1. I guess that in the meanwhile plasma2 will be done while Elegance project should be resuscitated etc, Summing it up we will be working on technology after the sprint. I'm no expert, but the vision should NOT be driven by technology but instead the other way around, once we have the vision and we have the solution to implement that vision, then we will have to care about what technology we have to create/adapt/adopt/etc. Of course since we are developers we will be doing technical work before vision/solution is finished. Just my two cents. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
