On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:50 PM Bhushan Shah <bs...@mykolab.com> wrote: > few thousand mobile devices with Plasma Mobile to end-users and > performance shown by Plasma qqc2 theme was simply not acceptable, we > even performed several benchmarks on all styles including desktop style > and Plasma theme and qqc2-breeze-style was clear winner there.
I didn't object that much there as having it just for plamo as a stop-gap solution looks acceptable. (though i feel there was no clear test or argument why qqc2-desktop style couldn't have worked) But i'm fine with that in the meantime. I would have preferred it in extragear though. > So yes, I take full responsibility for approving usage of > qqc2-breeze-style on Plasma Mobile and I think that was necessary, I'd > rather have a small bugs then completely 20-30 FPS UI on mobile which Plasma > theme was offering in some cases. > > - Was qqc2-breeze-style rushed for Plasma release schedule/inclusion? > > I honestly do not think so, Noah sent message about moving of > qqc2-breeze-style to kdereview on Jan 7, and Jonathan moved it out of > kdereview, 3 weeks of time is *enough* to raise any objections, but we (yes I know i should have objected back then) the weeks have passed, but wasn't specified anywhere as far I see where was intended to go? -- Marco Martin
