On Thursday 12 November 2009, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote: > > On November 2, 2009, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote: > >> http://github.com/edulix/gsoc/blob/master/kdebase-bookmarks.patch, > >> take a look only at the workspace/plasma part of it). In case this new > >> bookmarks system ships in, I don't know if mixing the firefox and > >> konqueror bookmarks in nepomuk runner would be a good idea? What could > >> be the best way in that case? > > > > the nice thing about having the Bookmarks as a separate runner is that we > > can get those returns quicker or slower than other data sets as they get > > their own thread to run in AND people can turn off Bookmarks searching > > easier when it's a separate plugin. > > > > so my question is whether the Nepomuk search runner should really be > > confined to "just" files on disk and other queries for things like > > Bookmarks be added to separate runners (like the existing Bookmarks > > runner)? > > Hi people, > > Now, thinking about this again, I wonder: lets say that in the near > future, konqueror bookmarks are directly stored in Nepomuk (which > quite possible). If we put bookmarks in a separate runner.. then both > the Nepomuk runner and the Bookmarks runner will return the same > entries when searching for a given bookmark. How could we deal with > these duplicated entries?
hmm, thinking about it.. -an unique id for a result, regardlessof the runer that owns it (would it feasible? would depend from what rhe result does for run()) so the results could be filtered or more simply, -the nepomuk runner excludes bookmarks, or -if the bookmarks runner knows somehow that the default browser stores bookmarks in nepomuk and the nepomuk runer is enabled, it doesn't search, so needs a way to define exclusions for runenrs Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
