On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote: > On November 2, 2009, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote: >> http://github.com/edulix/gsoc/blob/master/kdebase-bookmarks.patch, >> take a look only at the workspace/plasma part of it). In case this new >> bookmarks system ships in, I don't know if mixing the firefox and >> konqueror bookmarks in nepomuk runner would be a good idea? What could >> be the best way in that case? > > the nice thing about having the Bookmarks as a separate runner is that we can > get those returns quicker or slower than other data sets as they get their own > thread to run in AND people can turn off Bookmarks searching easier when it's > a separate plugin. > > so my question is whether the Nepomuk search runner should really be confined > to "just" files on disk and other queries for things like Bookmarks be added > to separate runners (like the existing Bookmarks runner)?
Hi people, Now, thinking about this again, I wonder: lets say that in the near future, konqueror bookmarks are directly stored in Nepomuk (which quite possible). If we put bookmarks in a separate runner.. then both the Nepomuk runner and the Bookmarks runner will return the same entries when searching for a given bookmark. How could we deal with these duplicated entries? Regards, Eduardo Robles Elvira. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
