On November 2, 2009, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote: > http://github.com/edulix/gsoc/blob/master/kdebase-bookmarks.patch, > take a look only at the workspace/plasma part of it). In case this new > bookmarks system ships in, I don't know if mixing the firefox and > konqueror bookmarks in nepomuk runner would be a good idea? What could > be the best way in that case?
the nice thing about having the Bookmarks as a separate runner is that we can get those returns quicker or slower than other data sets as they get their own thread to run in AND people can turn off Bookmarks searching easier when it's a separate plugin. so my question is whether the Nepomuk search runner should really be confined to "just" files on disk and other queries for things like Bookmarks be added to separate runners (like the existing Bookmarks runner)? -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
