On Monday 18 May 2009, Jared Kells wrote: > She said it's an important feature for her. With no prompting she explained > that it is just an estimate based on what she is doing now. When reading > email the time will be more then if she was watching a movie.
i have to ask: is it really not apparent that this is something i both acknowledge and agree with? at this point there are two rather different conversations happening here: one about whether it's a good feature in concept and one about whether it's possible to deliver that feature in a way that doesn't diminish things through the side effects of delivering untrustworthy information. the former is something we have general agreement on. no arguments. the latter is something that those who like to this feature in plasma are apparently not particularly interested in acknowledging, let alone discussing. repeating over and over the points we agree on does not avoid the requirement that we address the hard questions and will not wear me down so that i just relent and go "oh well, go ahead, i can't be bothered anymore." -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
