Le Wednesday 13 August 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > On Wednesday 13 August 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Le Tuesday 12 August 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > > > ownership of the Wallpaper* would then be taken by the Containment in > > > this case; > > > > Is that required? > > no; but then it's another connect-to-destroyed(QObject*) bit of code.
I think this solution would still have my preference over the current one. > > > which 3 properties? > > > > /me looks at his hand again. > > OK, I can't count it seems, the 2 properties so that obviously less of a > > problem *for now*. Could that grow? I've a hard time figuring out if it's > > likely or not... But somehow I clearly imagine that modes could have more > > information attached to them, for instance "is it animated?", for > > decision > > i think that would be internal to the wallpaper and not exposed. OK, makes sense. Regards. -- Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître, Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
