Damn spell checker. I'm not imposing a deadline. Paul via phone
On Aug 22, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >>> I'm always mystified in regard to the urgency of FF. My camera works great. >>> If I were a landscape photographer shooting wall-size murals I might think >>> otherwise, but I don't plan on > going there. >> >> Paul, this my cheeky, yet respectful response, and I know I don't need >> to explain the benefits of a FF sensor to you. >> >> If/when Pentax releases a FF body, and you purchase it, I'll pose the >> same question back to you. :) > Yes, I'll probably buy it, and there are some benefits to a 24 x 36 sensor > (my camera has a full frame), but the K-5 images are tough to beat. Just ask > the photo editors at the New York Times. I would like a larger sensor, but > I'm certainly not imposing a decline and losing sleep over it. That's just > silly. > > Paul >> Tom C. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
