> Here we go. > > I had some strong backlighting and underexposed the subject horribly. > > K-7, ISO 800, with the exposure pushed in LR by +2.00 > > The two files have exactly the same processes - one is just a "virtual > copy" of the other with the only difference being the "Process 2003" or > "Process 2010" for the RAW converter. > > It's not perfect, but it's a good example of the differences. > > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/noise_process_2003.jpg > > and > > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/noise_process_2010.jpg > > I still think in this case that it's an unusable image. But it's a lot > better with the new process. Many other images in here have gone from > "I guess it's alright" to "hey, not bad at all!"
Thanks - that's a very dramatic improvement! B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
