On 4/12/2010 10:46 PM, Michael Beacom wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
Weeeeeell, in a dream world, I would be able to get myself an ultra
sharp
100mm, f1.8 macro that is small and light, and has beautiful bokeh...
...but, we *are* talking Pentax here, so erm, there are few things
that they
bring out that are "ideal" (as much as I love them!).
I tend to agree with you here though Bruce. I think that I will have
more
versatility with the 100mm, and I really have been needing a decent
macro
lens for ages.
If only it was f1.8 instead of 2.8!! Oh well, it'll suffice I guess,
I just
wish that those damn babies would sit still in low light! Lol.
So, gaffers taping babies to the table is bad form?
Cheers
Mike
That would all depend on what kind of fetish you were catering to.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
