Flash exposures are always iffy, especially with a reflector. The histogram is your friend. I find that for most camera to subject distances, there's a stop that delivers a better exposure. Paul On Dec 5, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> > I experienced underexposures while shooting with the flash > (see my message with the topic about 540 FGZ flash). > > Igor > > Sat Dec 5 16:17:56 CST 2009 > paul stenquist wrote: > >> I find the K7 slightly less noisy than the K20D. Can't remember how >> noisy my *istD was. But I would expect the *istD to be a bit less noisy >> due to the lower resolution. However, the K7 exposure is very accurate, >> so overall noise performance is generally better than any of the Pentax >> digitals I've owned (*istD, 10 and 20)-- I rarely have to "bump up" the >> exposure. >> Paul > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
