Sorry for the sub epidermal result of my comments, Peter. After all your very adept re-do effort, I believe I prefer the original version. 'ya mad? ;( The additional and rather subtle, contour shadows in the egret's body seem to have come at the expense of some sharpness round the neck, head and beak. While the tree trunk may not be that close to the original shading, the color pattern adds to the image. Warning: I can be taken too seriously very easily. <BG>
Jack --- On Thu, 7/3/08, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PESO -- Fishing with egret. [Reloaded] > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 1:01 PM > Jack's criticism got under my skin, I don't know if > I can do better, but > I can do different. > > Slightly different color balance, (more green, more natural > wood tones > in the stumps). > More apparent detail in the Egret. Slightly less noise > reduction, (not > that there was much to begin with). > > http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20egretfishingiia.html > > Note: I used Raw Therapee for this attempt, rather than > Raw Shooter > Essentials which is my usual raw converter. Mainly because > it's better > at extracting borderline details from the brightest portion > of an > image. RSE however has a much better work flow not that > anyone cares > about a discontinued product. > I then created two intermediate tiff files one exposed for > the bird one > for the background and blended them together, sort of a HDR > image from > one exposure. > > The crops are slightly different and I corrected the tilt > as the water > was going to run out of the pond, but anyone interested in > comparing the > two images can do so, the link below is the old one. Yes > in many ways > this one is much better, but I really liked the color of > the original, > cartoonish though it may have been. > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored. > Jack Davis wrote: > > Not knowing any better, I'd take some of the > existing glow off of the feathers to see if more detail > became available. > > > > Jack > > > > > > --- On Thu, 7/3/08, P. J. Alling > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> From: P. J. Alling > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Re: PESO -- Fishing with egret. > >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > <[email protected]> > >> Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 10:38 AM > >> Any contrast adjustment at all starts to blow out > the birds > >> feathers, > >> I'd have to create a separate layer to keep > the > >> vibrancy of the > >> background. Maybe later, but it was just too much > work for > >> now. > >> > >> Jack Davis wrote: > >> > >>> Like the egret's placement, reflection and > general > >>> > >> look, but even though a ways off, am hung up on > the lack of > >> detail. It's soooo close. > >> > >>> Jack > >>> > >>> > >>> --- On Thu, 7/3/08, P. J. Alling > >>> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> From: P. J. Alling > >>>> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>>> Subject: PESO -- Fishing with egret. > >>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > >>>> > >> <[email protected]> > >> > >>>> Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 6:39 AM > >>>> I was going through some old files and > found this > >>>> > >> one. > >> > >>>> It's part of a > >>>> series I did to more or less test my > shoulder > >>>> > >> stock > >> > >>>> modification for > >>>> electronic shutter release cameras, but I > got a > >>>> > >> few decent > >> > >>>> shots of this > >>>> egret standing on a stump fishing, (I > posted a few > >>>> > >> others > >> > >>>> back then as > >>>> well). This one didn't seem quite as > >>>> > >> interesting or > >> > >>>> dramatic, but the > >>>> more I've looked at it the more I like > it. I > >>>> > >>>> can't remember which > >>>> lens I used, either the A*300 f4.0 with AF > 1.7x > >>>> > >> combo or > >> > >>>> the Vivitar > >>>> 600mm f8.0, Solid cat. Probably the > former as I > >>>> > >> don't > >> > >>>> detect any donut > >>>> shaped bokah, but you don't always get > that > >>>> > >> even with > >> > >>>> catadioptric > >>>> lenses. Well any it was an excuse for > another > >>>> > >> awful pun on > >> > >>>> egret... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20egretfishingii.html > >> > >>>> Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/unrecorded > >>>> > >>>> As usual comments are welcome but may be > totally > >>>> > >> ignored. > >> > >>>> -- > >>>> Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser > evil... > >>>> -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit > the > >>>> > >> link > >> > >>>> directly above and follow the directions. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... > >> -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the > link > >> directly above and follow the directions. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... > -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
