Bruce, This larger trend is also reflected in the U.S. wine industry. The "Robert Parker" scale is really to blame. Parker tastes zillions of wines each year, so each wine has just a few seconds to make an impression. If it is subtle rather than big, and not "hot" (high in alcohol), it doesn't get a high (90+) score. I think that photo.net has exactly the same problem. Delicate, subtle images just don't have a big immediate impact, so they get overlooked.
Probably comes with the short attention span endemic to American culture these days, too.... --Mark Bruce Dayton wrote: > > [cut, snip] > >In some respects, this seems to be following a larger trend. One in >which art is transcending photography. Try looking at all the photos >on photo.net galleries based on popularity. Almost all the shots are >soooo dramatic that they just don't hardly look like our planet - >even people shots have heavy doctoring of lighting. Extreme skies >and wild, saturated colors are the norm these days - even though >where I live, I see that kind of thing maybe once every few years. I >seem to be rambling...must be one of those days. > > >-- >Best regards, >Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
