> The images are only as credeable as the testifier. Absolutely. People forget this too easily.
Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ken Waller > Sent: 26 February 2008 21:21 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility > > Interesting article. > Thanks for posting. > > I attended several "Evidence Photographers International > Council" meeting > years ago & this was the subject of much discussion then. > Some of the ideas > mentioned in the article were discussed @ these meetings & it > was felt by > some that any of these measures could be overcome. > > It seemed to be the concensus then, that digital photography > had the same > issues as wet photography, in so far as evidence presentation > goes, but it > was much easier for someone to digitally alter an image. > > It all boils down to the credeability of the one who took the image. > When I've testified in product litigation trials, a main point in the > presentation of my inspection images was that I took the > images & they are a > true & accurate dipiction of what I saw on the day of my inspection. > The images are only as credeable as the testifier. > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: fwd: Effort Made To Restore Photography's Credibility > > > >I thought this article published by Anick Jesdanun of the Associated > > Press an interesting read. > > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23342630/ > > > > Godfrey > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly > above and follow the directions. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
