----- Original Message ----- From: "John Francis" Subject: Re: Ford claims ownership of images
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firestone_and_Ford_tire_controversy > ... > > In my opinion this demonstrates one of the big problems with wikipedia - > it is by no means an authoritative source, but people treat it as such. > Note that this article is flagged as possibly controversial or biased. > It doesn't really show anything except "some people say that ...". > It's tabloid journalism at best, not news, and certainly not evidence. Some people won't admit to something no matter how much evidence you put in front of them, or who you source it from. Wikipedia is as good a source as any in this instance, and I did cite other sources that said the same or similar in other posts. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
