Toralf Lund wrote: > P. J. Alling wrote: >> Larger buffer better view finder, same sensor. The Jpeg processing is >> more pleasing to those who're moving up from a P&S, but I doubt that >> you'd shoot Jpeg and who except a beginner would shoot Jpeg without >> setting up the camera to their liking. You disagree? Still obviously >> you want an argument so I guess you do. By the way have you even seen a >> K110D or it's direct ancestor the DL, let alone bought one? I thought not. >> > He, he. > > I actually observed someone using a DL last week, and have also seen it > in shops before. But the K110D? I don't think so... > > I've also sort of toyed with the idea of getting a "low-end" digital > body. I would have preferred the old kind of low-end, i.e. something > without "auto everything", but might still consider the K110 if I could > find one that was cheaper than the K100D by a reasonable margin. Which I > can't; if the shops list the K110D at all, it seems to be at the > original introduction price - where the K100D price has been reduced > somewhat significantly. And the gap between the K10D and the K100D has > probably narrowed, to... > > - T
Go for a DS, they're dirt cheap on the used market. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
