Inferior means slower or less accurate? My experience is that the DS AF is slower. I haven't tested on accuracy since it is more difficult to do in a short time.
(maybe my DS has some problem with its AF...since this is a common complaint with this model, I have never thought about it...) ----- Mensaje original ---- De: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Enviado: miércoles, 16 de mayo, 2007 18:26:15 Asunto: Re: Areas with Room For Improvement in Pentax DSLRs I've got an EOS 10D (Same AF system as the 350D) and it's inferior to the K100D's AF in low light. That said, the Canon's do handle multiple sensor AF better than anybody else (I always set my Nikons and Pentax's to single point with the centre sensor selected and leave them there). -Adam Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > Being the owner of a DS, my main improvements would be: > > 1.-Faster AF, specially in low light. I have read mixed reviews about this in > the K10D. The last one, in photozone, is very positive though. > This one is my current biggest pain, really annoying sometimes. When I borrow > a 350D, the difference is enormous in low light. > (...) ______________________________________________ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
