10D is slower and less accurate than my K100D was, but multi-point AF is actually usable.
The K100D has faster AF than the DS, Pentax did a superb update on the AF system for the K100D. -Adam Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > Inferior means slower or less accurate? > My experience is that the DS AF is slower. I haven't tested on accuracy since > it is more difficult to do in a short time. > > (maybe my DS has some problem with its AF...since this is a common complaint > with this model, I have never thought about it...) > > ----- Mensaje original ---- > De: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Enviado: miércoles, 16 de mayo, 2007 18:26:15 > Asunto: Re: Areas with Room For Improvement in Pentax DSLRs > > I've got an EOS 10D (Same AF system as the 350D) and it's inferior to > the K100D's AF in low light. That said, the Canon's do handle multiple > sensor AF better than anybody else (I always set my Nikons and Pentax's > to single point with the centre sensor selected and leave them there). > > -Adam > > > > Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > >> Being the owner of a DS, my main improvements would be: >> >> 1.-Faster AF, specially in low light. I have read mixed reviews about this >> in the K10D. The last one, in photozone, is very positive though. >> This one is my current biggest pain, really annoying sometimes. When I >> borrow a 350D, the difference is enormous in low light. >> >> > > (...) > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. > Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. > http://es.voice.yahoo.com > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
