It'll still be a percentage of the total shares available.(?)

Jack
--- John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If they buy back more of their stock, Sparxx will be left with a
> larger  
> percentage of the total that remains.
> 
> I doubt if that is what Pentax wants.
> 
> John
> 
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:15:17 +0100, Paul Stenquist  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Buying back your stock is seen as a healthy move by most long term
> > investors. And it generally results in an increase in share value.
> > Paul
> > On May 10, 2007, at 12:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> In a message dated 5/9/2007 8:28:53 P.M. Pacific  Daylight Time,
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> This thought may have been offered  as I've only looked at a few
> of
> >> these posts. It may be that Pentax is taking  the same route as
> many
> >> have and that's selling certain assets to generate  cash in order
> to
> >> control more of their stock, thereby hoping to fend off a  hostile
> buy
> >> out, in this case, by  Hoya.(??)
> >>
> >> Jack
> >>
> >> ==========
> >> Well, that's possible. But, if so,  it's a real desperation move.
> >> It would
> >> mean they are seriously pressed and this  may not come out the way
> >> people would
> >> like. I think it much more likely they are  decreasing debit to be
> >> more
> >> profitable. There are to ways to affect the bottom  line:  1. sell
> >> more  2. decrease
> >> debit.
> >>
> >> I would like to think  they are that rather than being so
> desperate
> >> to buy
> >> more stock and the only  raise the money to buy more stock is by
> >> selling HQ. On
> >> the decreasing debit  side, selling HQ would imply laying off a
> >> serious amount
> >> of middle management  and other things along those lines. But I
> >> don't quite
> >> understand the rules of  the merger with Hoya, evidentially they
> >> can't seek out
> >> outside investment during  that time period. So I suppose it is
> >> possible. But
> >> that type of move would not  appeal to current investors.
> >> Decreasing debit
> >> would.
> >>
> >> It might make  current investors, in fact, abandon ship. Which
> >> would not be a
> >> good  thing.
> >>
> >> Marnie
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------
> >> Warning:  I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ************************************** See what's free at http://
> >> www.aol.com.
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to