I have been near pros, but I don't want a "full frame" (misnomer alert) camera. Paul On May 9, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
> > --- Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Brendan MacRae wrote: >>> --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> For most people, the (significant) extra cost of >> the >>>> larger >>>> sensor just isn't worth it. >>> >>> For most people, yes. For most serious >>> photographers...that may be another story. >> >> PJs, sports guys and, yes, nature pros use 1DmkIIs >> with a 1.3x "crop" >> They seem pretty serious.... >> > > When I say serious photographers I'm talking about > pros or near pros. But again that's MY point; Canon > offers choices, two FF cameras and soon to have two > 1.3x crop cameras (the new Mark III is also 1.3, > coming in May). > > Also, not every sports guy will like the 5D because it > only has a 3 fps rate. The Mark IIn will do better > than 8 fps, and it will get you just that much closer > to the action with the same lens all for only another > $600. So some sports shooters are simply spending a > little more for a camera that's better suited to their > type of photography. > > -Brendan > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. > Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. > http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
