I'v been reading these AF tweaking posts closly, and have to agree with Godfrey.
I'm not going to do anything to my K10D. It seem crisp enough with the 16-45(better that with the istD)and 50-200. Besides i can screw up a light bulb replacement, so it was a givin.:-) Dave On 3/17/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After seeing all the hubbub with this stuff on DPReview.com, I > decided to leave my camera alone and do the fw 1.11 update. The AF is > close enough and produces excellent results. If I really need > critical focusing, I focus manually and use a focusing magnifier. It > only makes sense if I'm using a tripod anyway. > > G > > On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:32 PM, William Robb wrote: > > > So, on Lawrences recommendation, I went and fiddled with the AF > > offset, and > > decided that at distance, the camera now had some front focus > > issues. A few > > tweaks later, and now I have neutral focus at distance, but the > > camera will > > now have some back focus, though not as much as when I started, at > > close > > focus. > > I also have been reminded just how very good the FA31mm is at f/8. > > It is one > > kick ass lens. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
