Yes, as I'm processing my wedding pics from last night, I'd say I have to agree. It would be nigh impossible in jpeg. Paul On Dec 8, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> Yes, for that kind of work, jpeg is better. I did my 300 or so wedding >> pics in RAW, but I don't do this often. If I was trying to earn money >> shooting things like weddings, schools or Santa pics, I would be >> shooting jpeg as well. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU'RE RIGHT! :-)) > > I agree on everything but weddings. In my thankfully brief experience > shooting weddings I encountered all kinds of light sources: Daylight, > fluorescent, incandescent, candlelight, daylight-through-stained-glass. > Individually and in myriad combinations. I gave up on manual white > balance in the first half hour of my first wedding - I found I just > couldn't stop to change WB as often as I needed to. AWB and RAW is the > way to go. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
