On 09/12/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > >Yes, for that kind of work, jpeg is better. I did my 300 or so wedding > >pics in RAW, but I don't do this often. If I was trying to earn money > >shooting things like weddings, schools or Santa pics, I would be > >shooting jpeg as well. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU'RE RIGHT! :-)) > > I agree on everything but weddings. In my thankfully brief experience > shooting weddings I encountered all kinds of light sources: Daylight, > fluorescent, incandescent, candlelight, daylight-through-stained-glass. > Individually and in myriad combinations. I gave up on manual white > balance in the first half hour of my first wedding - I found I just > couldn't stop to change WB as often as I needed to. AWB and RAW is the > way to go. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
