I'm speaking of USM> The percentage is irrelevant without reference to the pixel size or the threshold. I back way down on the other two. Paul On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Wow, are you speaking of USM or Smart Sharpening? > > With the DS bodies, I have almost never applied more than 80-90% > sharpening with Smart Sharpening. More than that causes artifacts and > problems in most photos. A very few have required pounding up the > sharpening to "crunchy" for a print. > > Godfrey > > On Nov 24, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> I've used well over 100% many times. With the *istD photos, I >> generally used 261% at 1.5 pixels and a threshold of 11. With the >> K10D I'm still experimenting, but I seem to be coming in at about >> 100%, 1.2 pixels and a threshold of 19. It's all a matter of >> subjective taste. But I do look for artifacts and dial back if I see >> anything unhappy. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
