I was referring to Godfrey's remarks about USM values.
Paqul
On Nov 25, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Adam Maas wrote:

> Note that's Smart Sharpen, not USM, and I have a K100D not an *istD.
>
> -Adam
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Interesting. While I generally use a higher percentage, i also use a
>> lower pixel count and a higher threshold.
>> Paul
>> On Nov 25, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>
>>> With the K100, I'm usually at 3, 100%, but I often oversharpen a
>>> bit for
>>> effect.
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>>> Usually, my sharpening for full or doubled resolution "normal"  
>>>> image
>>>> files with Smart Sharpen is pixels: 2.1, 80-90%, basic mode. A
>>>> similar result with USM happens at pixels:1.7, 70%, threshold 2.
>>>>
>>>> Godfrey
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 24, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm speaking of USM> The percentage is irrelevant without  
>>>>> reference
>>>>> to the pixel size or the threshold. I back way down on the other
>>>>> two.
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow, are you speaking of USM or Smart Sharpening?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With the DS bodies, I have almost never applied more than 80-90%
>>>>>> sharpening with Smart Sharpening. More than that causes
>>>>>> artifacts and
>>>>>> problems in most photos. A very few have required pounding up the
>>>>>> sharpening to "crunchy" for a print.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Godfrey
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 24, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've used well over 100% many times. With the *istD photos, I
>>>>>>> generally used 261% at 1.5 pixels and a threshold of 11. With  
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> K10D I'm still experimenting, but I seem to be coming in at  
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> 100%, 1.2 pixels and a threshold of 19. It's all a matter of
>>>>>>> subjective taste. But I do look for artifacts and dial back if
>>>>>>> I see
>>>>>>> anything unhappy.
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to