Yep - it's damned annoying when people argue over stupid, inane, and useless points - think about that the next time your fingers are about to type something to the PDML.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Date: 11/24/2006 1:33:45 PM > Subject: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm > > It's like ordering a Coke when all they sell is > Pepsi, everybody knows what I am talking about > except possibly you, actually, scratch that, you > knew, you just want to argue over nothing. Since > the term IS came first, its more like a COKE than > a pepsi (pentax) . These are just different trade names > for the same damn thing, the image/sensor is moved to > compensate for camera movements to reduce blur... > What does Konica-Minolta call theirs? It's the same > technique as Pentax is currently using....If you dont like my > terminology > fine, but sometimes the generic term is the more appropriate > term to use. And in the case of Pentax, they are only > using one technique so there can be no confusion when > reffering to their version of "IS". > > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Shel Belinkoff > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 3:19 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm > > > Since we're talking about Pentax, get it right. Don't generalize - be > specific and precise. By using the wrong terminology you are passing > along erroneous information. The results are similar but the > implementation and the concepts are different. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: J. C. O'Connell > > > IS, VR, Shake reduction, etc. They are all the > > same concept ( done in either lenses or bodies ) > > with different trade names.... > > jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Shel Belinkoff > > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 10:11 AM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: Pentax 1.8 85mm > > > > > > Get it right - Pentax doesn't offer IS at this point. > > > > Shel > > > > > > > > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > > > > Yes, its technically an assembly, not a part. > > > And its way way simpler than IS > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
