You see, the super zoom is something I decided to avoid. I recently
bought Tamron 28-75/2.8 and I consider it to be my everyday
take-everywhere lens (Tim, you were right, when we met and we talked
about it a bit). Superzoom is bound to have made even more
compromises...

On 11/22/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, to hear of your loss Boris, especially if you had a good copy,
> which judging from your results, I would guess you had.  None of the
> lenses you've mentioned seems to be in the same class, reputation wise,
> as the F 70-210.  You might want to look at a super zoom, say in the
> 28-300 range as well.  I get surprisingly good results with my FA
> 28-200, and a friend has the Tamron 28-300 which she uses on her Canon
> with very good results as well.
>
> Boris Liberman wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > It seems that my F 70-210 lens is expired. I was suggested how I could
> > align it but my clumsiness caused the front element to detach and now
> > I don't think I can return the lens even to its original state, where
> > it would focus normally except infinity.
> >
> > I'd like to buy a longer zoom lens. Something like 100-300 or 80-320
> > or Sigma/Tamron lenses in this range. Although this question has been
> > asked many times - perhaps new Sigma DG lenses are worth my attention.
> > Or may be FAJ 75-300 lens.
> >
> > Also, if you have one of these lenses that you'd like to sell, please
> > let me know off list.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to