I used to own one of the Sigma 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 Apo Macro Super
lenses and it was pretty awful at the long end.
I think my copy was the Apo Macro Super II.  There are newer and I
should imagine improved incarnations of it, so just be careful if
you're buying second hand.  Make sure you're not geting one of the
older versions.

Wendy

On 11/22/06, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> I have a Sigma 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 Apo Macro Super and find it really
> useful. I've used it regularly now for about a year and have no
> complaints. As a macro it works better than I expected and if you want
> to chase butterflies around the garden it's ideal; giving half life size
> images at the Macro 300mm setting. If you do a search on the web you'll
> find a few informative reviews. Its a 35mm lens of course. I don't know
> anything about the DG version. The MTF looks good for 35mm and looks
> *really great* for the smaller sensor of the *ist D. There are several
> other versions of this lens that don't perform nearly as well. There is
> no chromatic aberration to speak of -- even in the corners. I haven't
> used it on a film camera, but would expect to find them. Maybe some of
> our other members have the same lens? The Apo Macro Super has a gold
> band around the front and is on page 8 of the Sigma lens catalogue.
>
> D
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to