So let's see what was actually written. John
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:33:44 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See my last post, it's a fucking lie. > I used no such abusive language or manner > With him on the ebay deal and went out > Of my way to see he was treated fairly > Then he Posts that horseshit? Its incredibly > Out of line slanderous thing to say > About anyone considering what I did > For him on that one. If he stated the whole > Story it would have been one thing and it > Would have been very clear that I gave > Him proper service but he didn't and that's > The scummy thing about it. I had to defend > Myself because of his insane, slanderous remarks. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John Francis > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:32 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > > > What's damaging about it, Tom? As far as I can see all that > Shel did was to suggest that JCOs dispute resolution style was > to respond with abusive email. Judging by the way he responds > on this list to anyone who dares to disagree with him I don't > find that claim in any way unbelievable. > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:26AM -0600, Tom C wrote: >> I now read all messages from JCO or containing the characters JCO out > of my >> junk mail folder. It means I don't have to worry about deleting them > from >> the inbox. >> >> However, I would be a little torqued as well at this kind of damaging >> remark, especially when the deal had been consumated to both parties >> satisfaction. >> >> Tom C. >> >> >> >> ----Original Message Follows---- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey >> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:02:37 EDT >> >> In a message dated 10/24/2006 9:51:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> JCO is an eBay vendor. Vendor reputations are based not only on the >> product they sell, but how they deal with customer service issues. If > a >> vedor treats his custmers like crap ( I am presuming Shel is being >> truthful based on JCO's conduct on list), then he has every right (and >> perhaps a duty to warn his friends) to tell the world he was badly >> treated. >> >> William Robb >> ======== >> Personally, I don't think things shared in private email should be > shared on >> list. It's a basic no-no in Net Etiquette. And I know Shel one time > shared >> something we had discussed in person, and I thought in private, on > list, and >> I >> didn't appreciate it at all. >> >> We are getting along pretty well now, so don't take this too > personally, >> Shel. And I don't want to rehash it either. >> >> But I think JCO has a perfect right to be thoroughly pissed off. > Regardless >> regardless of the content of what was shared privately between them. >> >> Marnie aka Doe >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
