I WAS INVOLVED. Y O U W E R E N ' T !
Its pure specualtive BS coming from you & At my expense. That's wrong. BUTT OUT! J C O -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:54 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey You've been carping on about this for a couple of day's now in a public forum. If you don't want people to comment, take it off list. Dave On 10/26/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Butt out. > > Stop slanderiing me with no evidence > Whatsover on the matter other than > The other partied self admitted incomplete > Memory of the resolution. > > You were not involved and have no > Right to be continuing with this > Nonsense based on your incorrect > "hunches". > > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John Forbes > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:47 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:30:55 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Yes I misread that one. Most likely because its > > A double negative. Most satisfactory would have > > Have been just as easy but you don't want you > > Use anything but the term unsatisfactory in your > > posts on the Issue of course. > > The word "satisfactory" is inappropriate in this context. When one has > a > dispute, and the other person is rude and unpleasant, the outcome can > never be satisfactory whether one obtains a full refund or not. > > Perhaps our intellectual capabilities are rather different, but I don't > > think a double negative is a very difficult concept to grasp. The fact > is > that the deal was unsatisfactory for both of you - you had to waste time > > and make a refund; Shel had to waste time and put up with your rudeness. > > Of course we only have Shel's word for all this, but it is supported by > > 400 abusive posts from you as circumstantial evidence. And before you > tell me that there were only 378 or whatever, I confess that my figure > was > just a guess. > > However, I note that this latest post from you contains no abuse, just > sarcasm. That is a major step forward. > > John > > > > > > > > jco > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > > John Forbes > > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:29 AM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:22 +0100, J. C. O'Connell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > >> Are both you and him retarded or what? > >> Why would he chose the LEAST satifactory > > > > Just read what I wrote, you halfwit. "Least UNsatisfactory" > > > > Your rudeness is unbelievable, but your stupidity is worse. > > > > John > > > > > >> Option I gave him. He wouldn't he chose > >> The BEST option I gave him of course which > >> Was even better than a full refund including > >> Shipping both ways which is a complete > >> Cancellation of the deal with zero cost > >> To the customer. > >> > >> He has no freaking right to complaing if > >> Chose his so called worst option because that's his > >> Own stupidity if he is standing by that. > >> > >> Secondly, I already stated this many times, > >> I did not verbally abuse him and my TOTAL > >> Refund offer is about as good as it gets > >> When there is a dispute. Thirdly, did you > >> Read the part about where he made the dispute > >> WELL AFTER he received the item and I still > >> Gave him both the full refund offer and partial > >> Refund offers. You are an idiot if you > >> Think that I didn't treat him fairly on > >> That deal because that is as fair as > >> It gets on item condtion disputes. > >> > >> And Fourth, he thought I sold him a "PERFECT" > >> Lens when the listing made no such condition > >> Claims whatsoever. He was doomed for dissatisfaction > >> Right from the start if he expected a PERFECT > >> Lens when it wasn't listed that way. You cant > >> Expect MORE than listed and complain about > >> It if you don't get MORE than listed. > >> He is just being a malicious person for even > >> Starting this issue on the thread and IMHO > >> He had no right to make his initial post the > >> Way he did considering how that deal was > >> Handled by both me (good) and him (bad). > >> > >> > >> jco > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of > >> John Forbes > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:28 AM > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > >> > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:24:40 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Boy, there must be something out there lessoning me. I had a recent > >> deal > >>> that I was not too happy about. Not the item, but the way the seller > >> was > >>> acting. In the end it worked out, but I was up in the air about > >>> feedback. Now this here, and a thread on another list made my think > > it > >>> through, and I realized I could not give a rating based upon what I > >>> felt, but had to base it upon how the transaction turned out. I just > >>> left him a positive. > >>> > >>> Anyone can make a mistake. All you can do when that happens is offer > >> to > >>> make sure it does not cost your customer anything. That means a full > >>> refund including all shipping. If John offered that then there is > no, > >>> not any, in any, way that the customer has a valid complaint. > >> > >> Sorry, I disagree. As Shel has posted, he took a partial refund as > the > >> least unsatisfactory option. Any Ebay dispute is worrying, and I can > >> imagine that dealing with JCO would be highly traumatic. > >> > >> John > >> > >>> Now, I will be the first to note that he has no idea of when to shut > >> up, > >>> but he seems to share that with a lot of folks here on the list, > >>> including yours truly at times. But, damn it, once a deal is done it > >> is > >>> done. I have always hated those folks who save up complaints to dump > >> on > >>> you maybe years later. However, I am going to filter out any further > >>> posts with JCO in the title, flame wars are not fun to me. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
