Shel never said you "ripped him off" he didn't even imply it. What he said was:

"When I bought the K50/1.4 from you on eBay, and told you the front element 
was lose, you replied with a challenging, abusive email. Of  course, I'll 
never do business with you again."

The "...you replied with a challenging, abusive email." part I can believe 
going by your email etiquette here on the PDML.

Given that Shel was making a point about your communication skills, not 
your eBay history, you seriously over reacted in your response & at the 
same time proved his point.

Dave



At 09:26 AM 24/10/2006, you wrote:
>And what do you call someone who
>Comes to a MUTUAL agreement on
>A business matter and then goes
>On to tell hundreds of people
>I ripped him off? That's incredible.
>He refused a full refund I offered and accepted
>A partial refund. Now he has the
>Freaking nerve to insinuate that
>I somehow ripped him off? That's
>Totally unfreaking believable.
>I take ebay customer matters very seriously
>And I don't think that saying something
>Like that after what actully happened is
>Even remotely correct thing to do. It's massive
>Slander. He was just taking a super cheap shot
>At me for reasons I do not know but
>That was just way too God Damn over the
>Line.
>jco
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>David Savage
>Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:47 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>
>Your a class act John.
>
>Dave
>
>At 08:30 AM 24/10/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> >Look I don't think it's right AT ALL for you to bring up
> >Our personal business matters on the list. THAT is far
> >More FOUL than any four letter word name calling. I have a spectacular
> >Reputation at ebay and I don't want people like you
> >Trashing me for no reason because we settled that minor
> >Dispute didn't we? You are getting really [EMAIL PROTECTED] low
> >To make comments like that about me on this list.
> >I do not rip people off and I am not a crooked ebay dealer.
> >Did we come to an equitable agreement on that
> >Issue or NOT? Now I am really f%#$%#ing pissed.
> >That's totally uncalled for. I suggest everyone
> >Go to ebay and check my feedback. You are a freaking
> >Low life to say something like that especially
> >After we settled that minor problem to a mutual agreement
> >At the time. In fact, that's it, FUCK YOU dude!
> >My ebay record speaks for itself, you are one full of
> >Shit asshole lowlife to say that kind of horseshit
> >About my business practices when there is nothing
> >To back it up. Arguing cameras is one thing but to slander
> >Me with this horsehit is going WAY WAY to far.
> >P.s. FUCK YOU AGAIN! I cant believe you did that. What
> >A freaking scumbag.
> >SINCERELY,
> >JCO.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> >Shel Belinkoff
> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:11 PM
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >Subject: RE: The JCO survey
> >
> >You've replied to me with your disgusting diatribes when I've not used
> >any
> >such tones with you. You have done so with others as well, often
>calling
> >people dumb or idiots, and worse, for expressing their opinions,
> >especially
> >those opinions run counter to yours. You've replied to me with your
> >disgusting diatribes when I have gotten fed up with you and replied in
> >kind.  Regardless of how people address you, you can choose to be
>civil,
> >but you don't.
> >
> >In fact, one of the list members noted that he's left the list several
> >times because of your posts.  He wasn't even writing to you, just
> >posting a
> >general message.  Your comment was "Screw you, dude ..."  (See below)
> >
> >I think that your foul mouth and abusive language are so much a part of
> >you
> >that you aren't even fully aware of what you say or how you come
>across.
> >
> >When I bought the K50/1.4 from you on eBay, and told you the front
> >element
> >was lose, you replied with a challenging, abusive email.  Of  course,
> >I'll
> >never do business with you again.
> >
> >
> >Shel
> >
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: J. C. O'Connell
> >
> > > My replies are of the same tone as the posts
> > > Directed at me. I never start with the name
> > > Calling but I will certainly volley.
> > > jco
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shel Belinkoff
> >
> > > How about because of your vile, disgusting language and rude
>behavior.
> >
> > > It's one thing to argue incessantly over the same point, but your
> > > "style" isn't fit for continuous human consumption.
> > >
> > > Shel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > [Original Message]
> > > > From: J. C. O'Connell
> > >
> > > > Screw You, dude. I don't see any reason why anyone
> > > > Would need/want to leave the list because of my posts.
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >[email protected]
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to