No because you have springs, tiny parts, a variable resistor with its own tiny linkage and the pot brush arm that depends on friction but not too much that it would wipe out the resistive surface.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > With a cam sensor we are talking about > Something far closer to a pair of pliers than > A mechnical watch. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gonz > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:59 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: The JCO survey > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>1. you are assumeing that these DSLRs will never need service >>2. can be more reliable means just that. A pair of pliers >>has moving parts, when was the last time you had a pair that >>didn't work? > > > I think a watch would be a better example. Your average mechanical > watch is not more reliable than the digital equivalent. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
