Not quite, I stated that it could be done a number of Ways today. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonz Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:28 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey
heck of course. it could use the same mechanism as an optical shaft encoder. but JCO's talking about the same design as in the past, not an entirely new design. rg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 12/10/06, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>No because you have springs, tiny parts, a variable resistor with its >>own tiny linkage and the pot brush arm that depends on friction but not >>too much that it would wipe out the resistive surface. > > > Tech now would make it cheaper to implement in an opto-mechanical > non-contact sealed unit. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
