Shel, What a stuck-up bunch of elitists we must look like. Put a picture up and we'll tell you where your are failing. Is that why we have PESO's? So we can frighten people off? What lurker is gonna put something out in this friendly forum?
I know you know John personally and perhaps he feels comfortable with your critique. Funny, but I would of thought he wouldn't have bothered to post the picture if he thought it was so common that it would be immediately panned. This is what I imagine the Leica list is like. Post your picture and we will tell you why it isn't good enough. Wow, I wish we were the old Pentax list where folks tried to give constructive criticism and friendly advice. I don't feel that spirit in your comments. Regards, Bob S. On 10/8/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My experience in photographing the moon is very limited, but it would seem > that your statement is rather broad. Depending on the lens used, ISO, and > the distance between horizon or skylines and the camera, I'd think that > there might be plenty of opportunities to have both the moon and the other > elements in focus. In fact, I'm sure I've seen some ;-)) > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Paul Stenquist < > > > However, I agree that some foreground elements can make such a > > shot more interesting. That usually works best as a composite, as > > illustrated by Jack. Otherwise, you can't get enough DOF at a > > reasonable ISO. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
