First, what do you see wrong? It seems to me that if the ideal format for landscapes is some large format (4x5, 5x7) then the digital equivalent should also be a format substantially larger than APS-C or perhaps even 645. I've seen some gorgeous work made with larger format digi backs.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: William Robb > I shot some landscapes this last trip with my istD that I normally think > of as large format type pictures. > They looked great on the computer screeen, not so good in print. > I'm not sure if an extra 500 pixels on a side is going to fix what I see > wrong with digital. > I think good landscape work is still large format film territory. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
