Ason one of the guys pushing a D-FA 50, it has nothing to do with the aperture ring and everything to do with loving my LX.
-Adam Brendan MacRae wrote: > I agree... > As I was telling Godfrey, the loss of the aperture > ring is just crazy to me. I noticed in the question > posed by Shel about the 50mm lenses that I'm not alone > in this. Many folks wanted a 50mm for digital as long > as it came with an aperture ring. > > I'm going to have to get used to not having them I > suppose, but I don't see the advantage...I just don't > see it. > > -Brendan > > --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On 17/09/06, Paul Stenquist >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>Aperture ring? For what? >> >>You've already forgotten? It's simply one of the two >>primary controls >>that photographers have over how a photographic >>exposure is set. >> >>-- >>Rob Studdert >>HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA >>Tel +61-2-9554-4110 >>UTC(GMT) +10 Hours >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ >>Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
