Don't know many painters, do you? No matter what trade you are in you discuss your tools and techniques with your peers.
Of course someone who buys a hammer does not think that makes him a carpenter. -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- P. J. Alling wrote: > Actually the difference between Painting and Photography is that > Painters can have long detailed discussions without once mentioning > paintbrushes, canvas or brush strokes. > > frank theriault wrote: > >> On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:18:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>> So the >>> limit between painting and photography is not really too clear. >>> Regards >>> >>> Jens Bladt >>> ======= >>> Definitely. Agreed. Big time. >>> >>> >> Nope. Gotta agree with Bob on this one. The difference between >> photography and painting is quite clear. Photography (in this sense) >> is an image derived from the momentary capture of light on an >> electronic or chemical sensor. Painting is the application of >> chemical substance on a surface. The fact that the results can >> sometimes look somewhat similar in no way makes the processes >> analogous. >> >> It kind of reminds me of the difference between sending a television >> image from one place to another, as opposed to teleporting that same >> object. Like in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Or Star Trek. >> They're two different concepts entirely, and can't be confused >> (although Willie Wonka confused them). >> >> cheers, >> frank >> >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
