Great! The 18-55 is somewhat underrated based on the few pics I've made with one, which was back when I got my first DS. See my review of the DA 16-45. The 18-55 would be just a little more of the same. I do like it's somewhat longer reach than the 16-45, makes the lens just a little more useful for me, but I like the wider end on the 16-45, which, yesterday, I discovered, while very handy, still isn't wide enough.
IAC, congrats and good luck with Tri-State and the camera. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Ann Sanfedele > I grabbed the body from Tri-state at $449.00 and the 18-55mm > lens - just cause I needed one auto lens. > > after swearing I'd never (again) buy anything on line - I > did it just now - > The shipping was outrageous - but I was too impatient and > didnt notice.... eager to > get it and give my borrowed mini Canon back to my friend. > > had it shipped USPS because the mail guys all know me > and I don't mind picking stuff up from Post office . > UPS and FedEX are a real PITA here. > > Everyone said grab it - I still paid less than I did for the > drowned Canon... > > Thanks to all you guys for suggestions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
