Yes -- I have experience with the D and the DS2. I was hoping that Jens, who has expressed serious frustration with the buffering speed of the D, could give an impression of whether the DL is any better than his D.
Or anyone else who's used both. -Aaron -----Original Message----- From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: Silver tools Date: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:34 am Size: 1K To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> I have a DS and a D, the DS2 is identical to the DS(with the 2.0 firmware revision), except for the size of the rear display screen. The DS is much faster shooting RAW than the D is. I do find the difference in controls very annoying. I generally prefer the two wheels on the D, and it over all gives a more solid impression in the hand, but the placement of the wheel on the rear Ds is much better. I have yet to fill the buffer on the Ds when doing what I would consider deliberate shooting, with at most one or two exposures a second for a series of three or four shots. The D will choke occasionally when shooting the same way. The DL has a smaller buffer than the D IIRC. Aaron Reynolds wrote: >On Jun 23, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Scott Loveless wrote: > > > >>The silver lenses look very nice with >>the silver DL. >> >> > >I was thinking the same thing. > >Jens, I'm very curious to hear how you find the DL stacks up to the D >-- I've been considering the DL2 as a backup for something, but if it >doesn't outperform the D in terms of buffer, I'm sure it would irritate >the heck out of me. > >-Aaron > > > -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
