On 21 Apr 2006 at 19:41, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > The results were surprising, and quite conclusive. Consistency of > rendering was always enhanced when an ICC profile was embedded. For a > measly couple of worth of data, particularly when some folks want to > post 200Kbyte image files for people to browse, I don't understand > the big deal about embedding them. If they're truly ignored by all > but the very few applications, why not? It doesn't hurt anything and > even at 28.8Kbps dialup speeds would only add 2-3 seconds per image > to download. Crap that isn't color management sensitive, like all the > stupid dancing whirlygigs and other nonsense that people embellish > their sites with, don't have to worry about it. (I often turn the > browser display of graphics off when I see that crap anyway.)
Enhanced? It either works or it doesn't work. It's as easy to prove whether it does on not by simply displaying an Adobe RGB formatted and ICC embedded image on any windows browser. Inevitably the image will be rendered obviously non- colour managed. Send me the images that you and your associate tested to derive your results and I'll use my screen colorimeter to test them and report back. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
