On 21/4/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: >If you read the copy, it's not really a prime vs. zoom test. It's a >demo to prove to Canon that his zoom is defective.
I understand that Paul, I read the page. However, the two lenses tested and pitted up against each other are a zoom and a prime. I think that the subject line 'wide prime vs wide zoom' is a pretty reasonable as a short headline and have such brazen confidence that I would do it all again :-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
