I don't know how expensive the Canon zoom might be. But unless it's a very inexpensive consumer zoom, I would expect good performance under all conditions. I think the new Pentax wide zooms perform very well. I don't test my lenses. I'm too busy using them. But I have yet to find fault with the DA 16-45/4, and the DA 12-24/4 appears to be even better. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I do - certainly to perform well under all conditions considering the > technology that's available to design and test lenses. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Boris Liberman > > > I don't think it is fair to expect from a complex lens such as 17-40/4L > > to perform equally well under absolutely all conditions... > >
- OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Cotty
- RE: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Bob W
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom David Savage
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Boris Liberman
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Paul Stenquist
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Shel Belinkoff
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom pnstenquist
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom David Savage
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom brooksdj
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Cotty
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom graywolf
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Godfrey DiGiorgi
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide zoom Cotty
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs wide z... Godfrey DiGiorgi
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs w... Cotty
- Re: OT - for info - wide prime vs w... Charles Robinson

