He was comparing against the 17-40 L series lens, which I believe is Canons top of the line range.
Dave S On 4/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know how expensive the Canon zoom might be. But unless it's a very > inexpensive consumer zoom, I would expect good performance under all > conditions. I think the new Pentax wide zooms perform very well. I don't test > my lenses. I'm too busy using them. But I have yet to find fault with the DA > 16-45/4, and the DA 12-24/4 appears to be even better. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I do - certainly to perform well under all conditions considering the > > technology that's available to design and test lenses. > > > > Shel > > > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > From: Boris Liberman > > > > > I don't think it is fair to expect from a complex lens such as 17-40/4L > > > to perform equally well under absolutely all conditions... > > > > > >
