I have this one:

http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/long/F100-300f4.5-5.6.html

The picture posted at
   http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/21s.htm
(Large version at
  http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/large/21O4-half.jpg )
was made with this lens on a tripod along with a Pentax-A 2x-S teleconverter fitted.

Godfrey

On Aug 19, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:

Glen wrote:


Hi,


[ ... ]

You mean this one:

http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/long/FA100-300f4.7-5.8.html
?

Someone said elsewhere on this thread that the FA100-300 sucks, but I suspect the were referring to this:

http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/long/FA100-300f4.5-5.6.html

In any case, I have the first one of those, and rather like it. Only tried it with film, though. I posted links to scans of a few shots elsewhere on this threads, but I'm not sure if they can tell you much...


- Toralf



Reply via email to