Yes. It's deliberate and correct. Your camera should expose for the
highlights.
Paul
On May 20, 2005, at 11:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure I've followed everything in this discussion, but on the
whole
my RAW files usually look slightly or more than slightly underexposed.
Doesn't
bother me because it means I have more to work with. Easier to lighten
than
darken. Hard to correct blown highlights. (The exception is when I
shoot backlit
subjects, but I am going to have to use exposure compensation more,
which I
haven't been.)
Have people been saying this type of behavior, underexposed look, is
sort of
deliberate?
Marnie aka Doe
